|
Os X Sample Rate Conversion = Horrible Performance |
|
|
|
mer. 31 mars 2004, 01:38
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 6
Inscrit : 04 sept. 03
Lieu : Baltimore - US
Membre no 24,165
|
At my job, I deal with very large WAVE files (around 1.5gig) recorded at 24/96.
The client gets data CDs with the 24/96 files on them, and also audio CDs of each file. We use PCs in our sound lab, but I recently aquired two Macs from our graphics department. On the PCs, we use Wavelab's batch processor to convert the 24/96 files to 16/44.1. This usual averages about 3 minutes file.
So today, I set up a batch process in Peak to convert the 24/96 files to 16/44.1, and to my amazement/disappointment, it was taking up to 40 MINUTES a file! That is practically real time! The PCs we use are standard Pentium 4's with about a gig or ram. The Mac I use is a 733MHz G4 PowerMac with 1.25 gigs of ram.
I just don't know what else to say. In addition to this devastating revalation, I have also found Peak and the dicontinued Spark to be less than comparable to the power of Sound Forge or Wavelab.
I won't be giving up my Macs anytime soon, but if anyone has any insight on the these issues, please bring your two cents to this post. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Réponse(s)
(1 - 5)
|
jeu. 1 avril 2004, 00:52
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 6
Inscrit : 04 sept. 03
Lieu : Baltimore - US
Membre no 24,165
|
I downloaded a demo of DSP-Quattro and it took just as long. In addition to that, every edit made to the waveform required the program to redraw the overview! With a 1.5gig file, that is an unacceptable amount of time to sit and wait after each edit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|