|
Latency In Osx, An end to latency? |
|
|
|
mer. 21 août 2002, 11:25
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 15
Inscrit : 15 août 02
Lieu : DUBLIN - IE
Membre no 6,879
|
I've been a pretty happy Protools user for several years now. Been putting off buying a new 'native' system 'til the whole OSX audio thing settles down. I think Protools TDM latency is about 1-3 ms on monitoring a record enabled input. I've heard that OSX with audio units is promising the same if not better performance running 'native' Apps?! Ideal scenario: Logic 5 OSX running @ 96k, with true dual processor support. Anyone any ideas if l Emagic plan to release a new Pro 96k Sound Card with multiple outputs? Am I expecting too much?
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 21 août 2002, 16:43
|
Groupe :
Messages : 0
Inscrit : --
Membre no 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 4 sept. 2002, 11:11
|
Moderator
Groupe : Team
Messages : 508
Inscrit : 09 juil. 02
Lieu : Sydney - AU
Membre no 5,658
|
I understand your frustration.
OS X is a great operating system and I can't wait to use it fully too!
I have a Powercore (with Sony Oxford EQ), UAD-1, RME gear (with OS X alpha drivers), FM7, Absynth, Battery, Reaktor, Stylus, Pro-52, PPG Wave, LM4, Model-E, Attack, Koblo Studio (which I doubt will ever make it to OS X), Lounge Lizard, Cellsynth, Modularing, most PSP fx, Linplug Delta III, Phatmatik Pro, Auto-tune, ReFX Beast Junox2 and Slayer, Fxpansion products, most Ohmforce plugs. All of these are legitimate (paid for) products.
I am hoping they will all be converted soon and also that most won't have an upgrade price otherwise I'm going to be up for a fair bit of money! So my biggest concern is that manufacturers don't all charge for OS X versions or not too much. Already I have to pay for Ohmboyz upgrades and also have to upgrade my copy of Spark to version 2.5 from 1.x which will cost me.
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 4 sept. 2002, 14:30
|
Advanced Member
Groupe : Members
Messages : 393
Inscrit : 11 juin 02
Lieu : London - UK
Membre no 5,044
|
we're in the same boat bro' my setup is completely virtual, absolutely NO hardware synths, fx or samplers. to make matters worse, i'm not a fan of exs24 or evp88! that leaves me with 5 es synths, a clavinet and a vocoder, oh dear... mixing 'aint gonna be much fun without the uad either. i don't want to go off topic, but i've heard GREAT things about the oxford eq, and i have (official) pretty much everything on your list of vsti's, the ohmforce plugs are incredible!!! finally(i'll shut up in a minute), nobody seems to have mentioned the fact that 10.2 takes 1gb of hard drive space AND an hour!!! to install. what's that all about?
--------------------
one for all and all for one...
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 4 sept. 2002, 16:21
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 3
Inscrit : 02 sept. 02
Lieu : New York - US
Membre no 7,305
|
I've installed OS X 10.2 over a OS X 10.1.5 (with the install option "clean install + keep current users") and it went smoothly in 40 minutes tops (even being a two CDs installation) ! Now OS X 10.2 is not only faster and rock-solid stable (no crashes ever) but the CoreAudio and CoreMIDI have been enhanced. Apple hired the guys of OPCODE responsible for the OMS development and now under OS X 10.2 you have a MIDI Manager where you set up your MIDI Setup in a graphic way (this is important to me at least, I do have real synths and samplers). Now Logic 5.3 running under OS X is a dream come true. So far, I think OS X 10.2 is the future. And the future is now !
|
|
|
|
2 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (2 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|