Does Anyone Still Use Cubase? |
|
|
|
sam. 22 mai 2004, 22:58
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 3
Inscrit : 15 mai 04
Lieu : Las Palmas G.c. - ES
Membre no 43,286
|
Hi Kolo If you decide to change setup Then would be better G4 and Logic to develop your talent. Currently I´m using that combination But G3 runs many good programs yet, I think the key is on the RAM capacity, for both. Success, Andy
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 26 mai 2004, 01:15
|
Maniac Member
Groupe : Members
Messages : 899
Inscrit : 12 oct. 01
Lieu : Kirkland
Membre no 2,002
|
I own SX2 performance is so bad on my Macs that I moved it to my PC, it has the highest minimum system requirements of any Mac DAW. I could only get 8-10 tracks on my new powerbook, same machine easily does sessions of 48+ tracks with DP4 and Logic6. Performance is one issue, The biggest problem with Steinberg is poor quality. they tend to add new features before fixing current bugs. I used Cubase from version 3-SX, and they have always had poor support. After two years of pain, and a paid upgrade, SX2 users finally have the app they thought they had purchesed in SX1. The kicker is that SX STILL has over 60 known bugs. Hans Zimmer uses VST/32 in OS9, otherwise he would have to get new hardware to play his current sessions. That's another thing, whenever there is a major version upgrade it renders your previous mixes useless because all parameters and automation do not transfer. You are forced to remix old sessions to use the new product. they are consistant in that business practice, been that way since version3. The user experience is that you feel like you are paying to be a beta tester.
Ce message a été modifié par gdoubleyou - mer. 26 mai 2004, 01:15.
--------------------
G-Dub
|
|
|
|
|
lun. 14 juin 2004, 14:46
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 1
Inscrit : 03 avril 04
Lieu : Los Angeles - US
Membre no 40,121
|
I'm using Cubase in Classic 9. Could we have a side forum to talk about our issues? All those Logic posts are not helping me.
Grayce
|
|
|
|
|
lun. 14 juin 2004, 18:47
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 2
Inscrit : 30 avril 04
Lieu : Los Angeles - US
Membre no 42,175
|
I am a long-time Cubase and Logic user, both current versions. If your new to MIDI or sequencing and you would rather create music than have your head buried in the manual for countless hours than I cannot stress enough to go with Cubase. (As a matter of fact I would upgrade to the new SX 2.x for many new features). With Cubase, I write and compose, and I get stuff done. Cubase has simplicity without sacrificing features. With Logic, I seem to always find myself digging out one of the 10+ manuals that come with Logic to figure something out. Cubase is by far not obsolete. You may not see as many posts related to Cubase because IMO most people are creating music with Cubase and not having to post messages to have to figure something out. To go into a little more detail on my opinion on this matter....Logic is a very powerful program which revolves entirely around what they call the "environment", which is a user created and user customized environment of every MIDI instrument and plug-in that you own. Although it can be a very powerful tool, its retardedly convoluted, and can be very hard to learn depending on your MIDI skills and sequencer saavy-ness. The basic fact is all the major sequencers (Logic, Cubase, Digital Performer, etc) can do all the same things, they just all do them in different ways, but in my 10+ years in sequencing I have found the following things to be true: Logic can be a bitch to learn, especially for beginners. Cubase has had a track record of being buggy, but Steinbergs gotten faster at updates and fixes. Digital Performer....a great program, but MOTU has the worst tech support EVER...of any company Ive ever encountered.
|
|
|
|
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|
|