MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Buffer Size Vs. Hardware, What's the deciding factor for lower buffers?
stimpy
posté ven. 2 mars 2007, 21:27
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 19
Inscrit : 27 août 05
Lieu : LI - UK
Membre no 69,242




Hi,
What is the most important factor in determining if a Mac can run the lowest buffers; for triggering drums (therefore needing the shortest latency times) etc?

Is it RAM size or CPU speed or Software/ Hardware configuration?

i.e. If I add more RAM will I get a better performance at the lowest buffer setting (instead of crackling) or is it simply my inherent system architecture?

Thanks.

Powerbook G4 1.5 GHZ 512MB OSX 10.4.8.
M-Audio Firewire 410
CubaseSX1 / Sampletank XL 2.2
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
posté sam. 3 mars 2007, 03:57
Message #2


Maniac Member
******

Groupe : Members
Messages : 899
Inscrit : 12 oct. 01
Lieu : Kirkland
Membre no 2,002




QUOTE (stimpy @ Fri 2 Mar 2007, 12:27) *
Hi,
What is the most important factor in determining if a Mac can run the lowest buffers; for triggering drums (therefore needing the shortest latency times) etc?

Is it RAM size or CPU speed or Software/ Hardware configuration?

i.e. If I add more RAM will I get a better performance at the lowest buffer setting (instead of crackling) or is it simply my inherent system architecture?

Thanks.

Powerbook G4 1.5 GHZ 512MB OSX 10.4.8.
M-Audio Firewire 410
CubaseSX1 / Sampletank XL 2.2


All of those are factors, but I have pretty much used the default settings with no problems, using Logic, DP4, and Live.

I could not get that kind of performance with SX, so I moved it to my PC where it ran great.

That , is probably your biggest problem. Mac SX and PC SX share the same code base. What that means is that there isn't ANY OSX optimization in the app, and you won't get acceptable performance unless you are using a G5 class machine.

In Mac DAW circles SX is known as the official G4 killer.

On my 1GHz Powerbook I had no problems with sessions of 24-32 tracks using Logic or DP. From my experience I was able to 40%-60% more instances of effects and instruments using Logic and DP.

I stopped my revenue stream to Stienberg when I realized that better SX performance would require a top of the line Powermac.

cool.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - lundi 30 déc. 2024, 09:30
- © 440 Forums 2011