|
|
Sample Rate |
|
|
|
mar. 22 févr. 2005, 16:23
|
Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Groupe : Editors
Messages : 15,189
Inscrit : 23 déc. 01
Lieu : Paris - FR
Membre no 2,758
|
More Hz will give you better high frequencies (way out the audio range) More bits will lower the noise floor. (yummy) Both will eat space on the hard drive and CPU to work them. Start with 24/44 and try if it's really better (audibly better where you are) at 24/88 or 24/96. which I doubt. You can easily in the end go down to 16/44 but mind that 48 and 96 kHz are not so easy conversions. Myself i'd stick to 24/44
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 23 févr. 2005, 11:02
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 13
Inscrit : 15 févr. 05
Lieu : London - UK
Membre no 60,558
|
I would consider how you are mixing. If you are mixing in the analogue domain, I would suggest recording at a higher sample rate. It is true that by upping your sample rate you are only gaining frequencies outside of your hearing range, but these frequencies do affect frequencies within your hearing range, so are important.
If possible I always try to record at higher sample rates and only convert down to 44.1 at the very last stage.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|
|